Is Flipboard Legal?

Social news app Flipboard was yesterday's hot new app, despite—or perhaps because of—technical problems that prevented some features from working. But there might be a bigger snag: Is Flipboard scraping content it doesn't have the rights to?

Flipboard, the new iPad app that renders links from your Twitter feed and favorite sites in a beautiful, magazine-style layout, has a problem: it scrapes websites directly rather than using public RSS feeds, opening it to claims of copyright infringement.

Unlike some similar news apps like Pulse, Flipboard appears to eschew the older syndication standby RSS to instead grab URLs from Twitter and Facebook feeds. While news sources that maintain their own automatic Twitter feeds tend to link the same stories as they do in their RSS feeds, there's one critical difference: RSS also allows content to be included in the feed, whereas Twitter provides only the URLs that link back to the full website. (Unless, of course, the site only writes 140 character news stories.)

Is Flipboard Legal?

Back in the ancient days of the mid-aughts, there was a healthy debate online about whether or not news outlets should provide full content feeds or simply headlines and excerpts. Rather than rehash that debate—one that's still ongoing—just remember this: whether a company chose to publish "full feeds" or excerpts, the choice remained theirs.

A new class of "feed readers" have ditched RSS and built their own content scrapers. The ever-popular Instapaper—the adblocker it's okay to like!—is a scraper: a reader views a story in their web browser (along with ads and other web chrome); clicks "Read Later"; Instapaper uses some sorting magic to figure out what part of the already-downloaded HTML is content and which is cruft.

From a licensing and copyright perspective it's a little bit iffy, but since content providers get at least one pageview every time someone uses Instapaper there has been a sort of truce. (One made more steady by the fact that many of those working in the media who might get frustrated by scrapers are also fans of long-form content—exactly the sort of reader to which Instapaper caters.)

It appears that Flipboard uses a very similar technique to scrape content from the sites that are indexed within the app. A story from about Kosovo appeared in my copy of Flipboard under the "FlipNews" section with a headline, picture, and about three-and-a-half paragraphs of content, despite that CNN's feed gives only a headline and a dek (a summary sentence).

How Flipboard Works

I posed these very questions to Flipboard's co-founder Evan Doll:

Is Flipboard using a custom scraper for content that is pulling content from content websites?

Doll: Flipboard is using a parser that is very similar technically to Readability by Arc90 and Safari 5's Reader feature.

Does Flipboard use RSS? Or is it all Twitter and Facebook feeds?

Doll: Flipboard does not currently use RSS.

Is the content passing through Flipboard's servers before being sent to users' iPads?

Doll: The content parser runs on Flipboard's servers. It simply wouldn't be possible to run on the client for reasons of speed and complexity.

Is the scraper universal/generic, or are there customer scrapers for certain sites?

Doll: It is mostly universal/generic. However, we can limit the amount of content displayed on a site-specific basis. We already try to do this with some sites that publish extremely abbreviated RSS feeds- even though we aren't using RSS directly, we attempt to achieve display parity with their feed.

We're happy to accommodate the requests of any content publisher who want to choose how much content to show in Flipboard, or to hide their site's content altogether.

What is the rationale for scraping content? I presume you guys are claiming a reasonable system under fair use, but what is Flipboard's policy?

Doll: Flipboard shows short content previews. We do not offer a "full article" view in Flipboard for articles of arbitrary length. If the user wants to read the full article, they tap "Read on Web" and are taken to the full site in an embedded browser.

We see Flipboard a great way to discover content, particularly recommendations from your friends of sources that you may not already subscribe to. As such, we believe that we're providing value to content creators by helping to drive new readers in their direction. As mentioned before, though, we are happy to limit or hide content as requested.

In the past 48 hours, we've received an incredibly positive response from content creators who are happy about being featured in Flipboard, and who want to work with us on doing a better job displaying their content. Hopefully we can do more on this front soon.

Onkyo Digital Picture Frame Has HDMI Port For Secondary Monitor Usage

The Onkyo LPF10M01 could be the best digital picture frame ever. Why? Because thanks to a HDMI port, it's so much more than just a silly digital picture frame. Think of it as a 10-inch portable display.

Onkyo Digital Picture Frame Has HDMI Port For Secondary Monitor Usage

The 10.1" Onkyo frame works with anything that hooks into the HDMI port so you could use it to play video games, watch movies or just as a secondary monitor. The screen is LED backlit and Onkyo is saying its 1,024x600 resolution is the highest of any digital picture frame.

The Onkyo LPF10M01 will go on sale in Japan for $230, if it ever reaches stateside, I'd probably end up buying one.

Onkyo Digital Picture Frame Has HDMI Port For Secondary Monitor Usage

iPhone 4 ????

If you see a iPhone 4, JUST RUN AWAY...This is a reader video found on Macrumors forums illustrating something weird. When the guy holds the iPhone in his hands, touching the outside antenna band in two places, he drops reception. Placing the phone down gets him 4 bars.

We're not sure if he's doing something particularly weird, like holding the metal antenna in such a way that it's shorting out. But it is strange. Or, it could be just a bug in the software, showing no bars and no reception even when you do have reception. But, he does hold the phone with the glass, and it doesn't have this reception issue.

If you've got an iPhone 4, we'd like to have you test this out too, and contribute to YOUR iPhone 4 review. Test holding it in various ways, like one finger on the glass and one on the metal, or any combination that you think might produce different results. Let us know what you find.

Update: Make sure to test this while you're IN a call too, to see if the call drops. This way we can determine if it's just displaying bars incorrectly, or if it really does impact your reception.

Update 2: Here's a video from Foundry Architect (same guy as above), with Wi-Fi off, that illustrates the same issue.

Update 3: Another confirmation from Chris Morris where he shows the problem, where it doesn't lose service, but loses about 4 bars.

Chris also said he tested the hands thing while in 5 calls, and said that none have dropped so far. He had a conversation for 10 minutes while the phone was displaying no signal with no problem. This might point to a display issue? But how does that explain the images below, in Update 4? Weird. Here's him making a call while the phone shows 0 bars.

Update 4: Reader Chris Sheehan did a speed test with the phone sitting down, with his hands on the phone, and one with his hands on but with a leather case on it. They're in order, and the one with his hands on the bare phone is really bad times.
iPhone 4 Loses Reception When You Hold It By The Antenna Band?

Chris also says he went do dial a number when he lost signal with his hand on it, and could not get a call out.

Update 5: Reader Garrett Hampton has the same, and his illustrates dramatically going from 5 bars to 1 bar, back to 4 bars. This is worrying.