Lurking in the archives of last month you'll find details of the 9-inch Windows 7 tablet PCcoming later this year from French manufacturer Archos. Today, the wait to know how it functions is over, as we spent a morning fingering it. Oh, and we know now that it'll cost £450 for an 80GB model, and £500 for a 160GB.
First, a quick reminder of les autres caractéristiques. This is a tablet PC weighing 623g, featuring a 9-inchcapacitive touchscreen (that's the sexy kind, like the iPhone), an Intel Atom Z515 CPU, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 2.1, plus built-in DVB-T antennas, which should allow it to receive and store Freeview TV in the UK.
It feels like a solid piece of kit. Used as a weapon, you could probably knock a decent-sized mammal unconscious, up to and including a cheetah, though a musk ox would certainly be a step too far and require a full-size laptop. The capacitive screen -- which was running at 1,024x600-pixel resolution -- was responsive and allowed us to click around the Windows 7 release candidate without any real problems.
And because it's capacitive, you can safely ditch your stylus right now. Three of your finest cheers can be released in response to this news.
The on-screen keyboard takes up roughly half of the lower part of the screen when brought up. Again, as this is a touch-sensitive, as opposed to pressure-sensitive screen, tapping on a virtual Qwerty keyboard is relatively painless. Unless you're typing a novel, in which case using a touchscreen is about as enjoyable as having an eyeball removed.
Time was short this morning, so we didn't have an opportunity to benchmark or perform any kind of scientific tests dans le tablette, so check back for our full review in the coming weeks.
For now, enjoy the plateau of visual treats over the next few pages, as we explore the physical attributes of one of the most interesting French inventions since Madame Guillotine.
Update: We discussed the Archos 9 having a capacitive touchscreen, but Archos's Web site specifies a resistive screen that uses a stylus. This is causing us some confusion, so we're looking into it. If that screen was resistive, it may be one of the best resistive screens we've ever seen -- so good, and so sensitive, it had us believe it was capacitive. We'll update when we get confirmation either way.
0 comments:
Post a Comment